WASHINGTON — Two Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee would return the EPA to its practice of relying on advice from a balanced group of experts.are demanding that the Environmental Protection Agency provide records related to a decision by the agency’s new leader to remove dozens of scientists and other experts from two vital advisory boards. EPA Administrator Michael Regan has administration were overly friendly to business. His March 31 “reset” of the Science Advisory Board and
Regan’s overhaul removed more than 45 members of the two science advisory boards, including some whose terms do not expire this House Oversight Committee, while Norman is the top Republican on the panel’s environment subcommittee.. The panels provide scientific expertise and recommendations for standards and other policies to protect public health and the environment. But . James Comer of Kentucky and Ralph Norman of criticized Regan for an unwarranted “purge” based more on politics than science. Comer is a senior Republican on the
“Traditionally, science advisory boards are bipartisan panels to advise the administrator. Unfortunately, it appears theis continuing to purge officials in the government who do not share its political beliefs,” Comer and Norman wrote Wednesday in a letter to Regan. “The midterm firing of science advisory board members within the first months of a new administration …. raises about the politicization of the EPA,” they added. In an interview late last month, Regan told The Associated Press that while he was clearing out the two essential panels, ousted members could apply for reinstatement.
“Scientific integrity is a foundational value for EPA,″ Regan said. “And I am committing to ensuring that every decision we make meets rigorous scientific standards.” Democrats have said a 2017 decision byfirst EPA administrator, Scott Pruitt, to remove many academic scientists from the advisory panels tilted them favor the chemical and fossil fuel industries. If they had received EPA research grants, Pruitt barred scientists from serving on the advisory boards. Pruitt later , but his policies continued under his successor and former deputy, Andrew Wheeler.
, John Graham, the former chairman of the Science Advisory Board, said that Regan’s “radical action″ disrupted his service and that of every board member. The professor said he would not reapply “because I respectfully protest the entire process that Administrator Regan has concocted.″ Regan, 44, was sworn in on March 11 as the first to run the EPA. He served as North Carolina’s top environmental regulator for four before that and worked at the EPA during the Clinton and Bush administrations.
He told the AP that the reset of the two advisory boards — and the removal of all members of both boards — “are indicative of how serious we are about repairing the scientific integrity at EPA.″REGAN SAID THAT the EPA will also be part of aTrump-era political interference in science across the executive branch. In their letter, Comer and Norman asked the EPA to provide by April 21 all documents and communications — including any with the — from January 20 on related to the ouster of the advisory board members.